X

Search for Knowledge!

Sort by Category

Categories

Sort by Date

«April 2024»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011

Latest Knowledge

Latest Knowledge

  • All
  • Mishap Reporting & Investigation
  • On-Duty
  • Aviation
  • Military Ops & Training
  • Government Vehicle
  • Workplace
  • DA Civilian
  • Explosives & Weapons
  • Off-Duty
  • PMV-4
  • PMV-2
  • Recreational & Specialty Vehicle
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Privately Owned Weapons
  • Home & Family
    More
    A Feline FOD Check 0 Aviation
    USACRC Editor

    A Feline FOD Check

    Foreign object damage on a military aircraft is a serious issue. Before every mission, the entire flight crew, which is five personnel on a CH-47, checks for foreign object debris (FOD) and ensures the aircraft is ready for the mission. Depending...
    Going Downhill 0 Sports & Recreation
    USACRC Editor

    Going Downhill

    One April, my sister talked me into running an insane 24-hour relay race called the Ragnar. Twelve of us decided to take on this challenge — a 192-mile trek through the scenic Wasatch Mountains, just east of Salt Lake City. With so many in...
    In the Zone 0 PMV-4
    USACRC Editor

    In the Zone

    Work zones on U.S. highways have become increasingly dangerous places for workers, drivers and passengers. There are a large number of work zones in place across America; therefore, highway agencies are working on not only improving communication...
    Your Undivided Attention 0 PMV-4
    USACRC Editor

    Your Undivided Attention

    If you identify as a multitasker who can do three or more things at a time well, please pull over to the side of the road, turn off the radio and put down the coffee. If you are someone who can only do one thing at a time, thank you for your...

    No content

    A problem occurred while loading content.

    Previous Next

    Sharing the Good and Bad

    Sharing the Good and Bad

    CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER 2 MICHAEL SAWYER

    All too often in aviation, we are hesitant to admit when we don’t know something or, even worse, that we made a mistake. This is not surprising considering that, as a community, we are mostly Type A personalities. This was never more evident to me than when my unit began to turn in our OH-58A/Cs and transition to the UH-72 Lakota.

    When we picked up the first two aircraft from the factory, we had four Readiness Level 4 pilots with the 9.5 hours of experience earned at the Eurocopter two-week factory transition course and two instructor pilots (IPs) who had about 30 hours each in the aircraft. For all of us, this was a second and, in some cases, third aircraft qualification. We knew how to fly, but with about 100 hours total Lakota time in the company and little to no institutional knowledge available, we relied heavily on honest feedback from each other. This was especially true when it came to flying instruments using the commercial avionics and autopilot.

    For the next three to four months, as the two IPs progressed, the other four of us realized the quickest way to learn and become effective with our new aircraft was to let the “I’ve-got-this” attitude go and develop a more humble and open attitude about our mistakes. Once we realized the difference this was making, we began to admit not only our mistakes, but the close calls as well. This allowed for everyone to experience the same mistakes, gain the knowledge of those mistakes and avoid establishing any trends before they could become a problem.

    In other aviation units I’ve been in, it was almost taboo to admit when you made a mistake or a decision you wished you could take back. Observing other units I’ve worked with has shown me that this is nowhere near an isolated phenomenon. I wonder how many aviators have had a close call or made a bad decision that might have been avoided if they had heard of someone else making the same mistake. If nothing else, hearing someone else’s experiences, both good and bad, gives another person the opportunity to think through a situation before they are faced with it in real time and are in position to affect a better outcome than would have been the case otherwise.

    This attitude has to come from the top down. In my case, it started with the company commander and standardization pilot. They set the example and encouraged us as a group to discuss both our successes and our mistakes. This doesn’t have to be any kind of formal event, but more of a willingness to admit our mistakes and close calls.

    Speaking as someone who was the junior pilot in my formation, this kind of attitude gives new aviators the confidence to not only speak up, but to see the thought process of those multi-thousand hour guys as well as discuss those decisions outside of the cockpit. This mindset has now been a key factor in our unit’s success for years. Make it part of your unit’s culture.

    • 18 February 2024
    • Author: USACRC Editor
    • Number of views: 400
    • Comments: 0
    Categories: On-DutyAviation
    Tags:
    Print