X

Search for Knowledge!

Sort by Category

Categories

Sort by Date

«May 2024»
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

Latest Knowledge

Latest Knowledge

  • All
  • Mishap Reporting & Investigation
  • On-Duty
  • Aviation
  • Military Ops & Training
  • Government Vehicle
  • Workplace
  • DA Civilian
  • Explosives & Weapons
  • Off-Duty
  • PMV-4
  • PMV-2
  • Recreational & Specialty Vehicle
  • Sports & Recreation
  • Privately Owned Weapons
  • Home & Family
    More
    Railhead Ops: Back to Basics 0 Military Ops & Training
    USACRC Editor

    Railhead Ops: Back to Basics

    Rail remains a vital part of the deployment process. During past deployment operations, the Army relied on contractors to do the majority of the loading. But with the focus on large-scale combat operations, a unit’s Soldiers will be...
    Rested and Ready 0 Aviation
    USACRC Editor

    Rested and Ready

    Showing up to the mission in a fatigued state is unacceptable. This happens all too often in aviation. One of my recent flight manuals stated: “A pilot must show up to work free of stress.” Although we may not be stress-free, we may...
    Crosswalk Catastrophes 0 PMV-4
    USACRC Editor

    Crosswalk Catastrophes

    Since I am lucky enough to live in an area with year-round nice weather, I have eschewed the treadmill and opted to trek the sidewalks near my home. Now that I am spending more time as a pedestrian, I’ve discovered many drivers do not...

    No content

    A problem occurred while loading content.

    Previous Next

    Blurred Lines

    Blurred Lines

    CHIEF WARRANT OFFICER 4 BENJAMIN CUEVAS
    U.S. Air Forces in Europe Air Ground Operations School
    Einsiedlerhof Air Station, Germany

    During Operation Iraqi Freedom V and VI, we faced one question repeatedly: Should we launch or stay on the ground during marginal weather? As all Army aviators know, sometimes mission importance outweighs weather minimums. The question then becomes where to draw the line. In garrison, the answer is simple; you either have weather or you don’t. In combat, however, the line gets blurred.

    The first couple of months we stuck to our minimums with little deviation. But as time went on, our command became more comfortable with flexing minimums to meet mission demands. These deviations were due mostly to troops in contact, and we quickly realized flying in marginal weather significantly degraded our capabilities. Targeting, even with MTADS-equipped aircraft, was almost impossible. And flying at lower altitudes caused us to be highly vulnerable to small-arms fire. Our presence, however, still served as a deterrent.

    As AH-64 pilots, our primary mission is to save the lives of coalition forces. Therefore, aircrews and our command were willing to accept the increased risk of flying in less-than-optimal conditions. That is where the line began to blur. What was once an exception quickly became the standard. This was mostly caused by aircrews becoming more comfortable flying in adverse weather, giving the command the option to accept more risk and push the weather limits even further.

    There were times, though, when our command had little impact on the decision to fly in downgraded weather. If a general had somewhere to go and wanted an escort, “no” was not an option. In these cases, our command was fighting a losing battle because they were the risk-level approval authority.

    As time went on, things got worse and we continued to allow ourselves to get put into increasingly dangerous weather situations. New questions began to be asked through all levels of our unit because we were now expected to launch in all weather conditions. There were many times when we were the only aircraft flying in Baghdad. Sometimes we were flying in bad weather without even having missions to support. As aircrews, we asked a couple of questions: Where do we draw the line on weather? How long were we going to continue to push our luck? These questions went unacknowledged and unanswered by a fairly hostile command atmosphere at the battalion level, and we continued to fly further below established weather minimums.

    Weather minimums are in place for a reason. In garrison, weather minimums are strictly enforced. Of course, in combat, there are situations where making an exception is pertinent. But those situations should be just that — exceptions, not the standard. The problem is once you make one exception you are expected to keep making it.

    It’s easy to sit here and try to blame it all on our command, but aircrews were just as responsible for what happened. We all knew our minimums, but we still chose to launch, mostly due to the fear of possible repercussions. But we still did it. We should have been asking ourselves at what point the mission outweighs the increased risk of flying in bad weather. Answering that question for yourself will let you know when to stand your ground and not launch.

    • 1 February 2016
    • Author: Army Safety
    • Number of views: 1073
    • Comments: 0
    Categories: On-DutyAviation
    Print